<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>amf &#124; ref &#187; batery</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ref.amfdesigner.com/category/batery/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ref.amfdesigner.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 25 Jul 2011 21:59:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>USBCELL batteries reviewed</title>
		<link>http://ref.amfdesigner.com/2006/10/31/usbcell-batteries-reviewed/</link>
		<comments>http://ref.amfdesigner.com/2006/10/31/usbcell-batteries-reviewed/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Oct 2006 17:10:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[+geek]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[batery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[usb]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ref.amfdesigner.com/?p=103</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
It&#8217;s not too often that you see a review of AA batteries here on Engadget. But then again, the USBCELL AA batteries aren&#8217;t just your garden-variety portable cells, either. Our compadres over at TrustedReviews have just taken a set of these fine USB-chargeable batteries for a spin, and have given them a pretty favorable review. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote>
<p>It&#8217;s not too often that you see a review of AA batteries here on Engadget. But then again, the USBCELL AA batteries aren&#8217;t just your garden-variety portable cells, either. Our compadres over at TrustedReviews have just taken a set of these fine USB-chargeable batteries for a spin, and have given them a pretty favorable review. After charging a set of &#8216;em for use with a Fuji FinePix cam, TrustedReviews found that it took over 500 snapshots for the batteries to give up. By comparison, a set of Duracell Alkaline batteries only lasted for &#8220;a few pictures.&#8221; The review concludes: &#8220;For a combination of convenience and eco-friendliness then the USB Cells get the thumbs up. Once a wider range becomes available and if the price [$24 for a pair] can drop a little, then they&#8217;ll could well do for batteries what USB memory sticks did for floppy discs and virtually kill them off.&#8221; We can&#8217;t wait to try &#8216;em ourselves.</p>
</blockquote>
<p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2006/10/31/usbcell-batteries-reviewed/">Link</a></p>
<p>[Via <a href="http://www.engadget.com/">Engadget</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://ref.amfdesigner.com/2006/10/31/usbcell-batteries-reviewed/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

